设为首页收藏本站

『外汇堂』·专业外汇论坛

 找回密码
 注册

QQ登录

只需一步,快速开始

搜索
热搜: 活动 交友 discuz
查看: 11427|回复: 22
打印 上一主题 下一主题

Dukascopy被FXweek评为年度最具创新的银行电子交易平台

[复制链接]
跳转到指定楼层
1#
发表于 2011-8-13 09:16:29 | 只看该作者 回帖奖励 |倒序浏览 |阅读模式
Dukascopy被FXweek评为年度最具创新的银行电子交易平台,同时获此殊荣的是巴克莱资本和摩根大通。
详见http://www.fxweekefxawards.com/static/shortlist-2011
分享到:  QQ好友和群QQ好友和群 QQ空间QQ空间 腾讯微博腾讯微博 腾讯朋友腾讯朋友
收藏收藏 转播转播
2#
发表于 2011-8-13 09:26:00 | 只看该作者
原帖由 蘑菇 于 2011-8-13 09:16 发表
Dukascopy被FXweek评为年度最具创新的银行电子交易平台,同时获此殊荣的是巴克莱资本和摩根大通。
详见http://www.fxweekefxawards.com/static/shortlist-2011

真的吗?挺好.
3#
发表于 2011-8-13 09:30:13 | 只看该作者
就是没有盈透,嘿嘿
还jb牛X.
dukascopy周末杠杆要是不变就更好了.
4#
发表于 2011-8-13 11:03:30 | 只看该作者
清者自清,浊者自浊。是金子总会闪光。
5#
发表于 2011-8-13 11:12:09 | 只看该作者
我们来点公认度更专业的吧。标普评级,IB的评级为A-和A-2。The basis of our stand alone rating on IB is its solid financial profile.
Interactive Brokers LLC Rated ‘A-/A-2’; Outlook Stable
Overview  
We consider Interactive Brokers LLC (IB) a core operating subsidiary of IBG LLC. ƒ We are assigning IB an ‘A-/A-2’ counterparty credit rating. ƒ Future ratings actions on IB depend largely on our ratings on its parent, and to a lesser extent its stand-alone credit profile. Rating Action On May 24, 2010, Standard & Poor’s Ratings Services assigned its ‘A-/A-2’ counterparty credit rating to IB. The outlook is stable. Rationale The ratings on IB are based on our considering it a core operating subsidiary of IBG LLC, as well as on IB’s solid financial profile and successful but undiversified niche franchise.  We consider IB a core subsidiary of IBG. Although IB is by far the smaller of IBG’s two main operating subsidiaries, in our opinion IB contributes important revenue and business-line diversification to the consolidated entity. In our opinion, management is fully committed to this business. We believe it would be very difficult for IBG to sell IB because IB’s biggest competitive advantage is that it runs on the same proprietary systems as IBG’s marketmaking business.  The basis of our stand alone rating on IB is its solid financial profile. This is based on what we consider strong capitalization, adequate liquidity, and solid profitability. In addition, IB has little credit or market risk exposure because it maintains a very simple, low-risk, and low-leverage balance sheet.

[ 本帖最后由 weijian 于 2011-8-13 11:34 编辑 ]
6#
发表于 2011-8-13 11:14:22 | 只看该作者
IB获奖目录:
Barron's2011年奖项
In the software-based competition, Interactive Brokers is once again ranked low cost broker with a 4.5 in 20111.
Interactive Brokers earned a 4.0 in 20111 for "Research Amenities", the highest star rating awarded by Barron's.
Interactive Brokers earned a rating of 4.5 in 20111 for "Best for Frequent Traders".
Interactive Brokers earned a rating of 4.5 in 20111 for "Best for International Traders", the highest star rating awarded by Barron's
Interactive Brokers earned an overall rating of 4.5 in 20111.

Stocks and Commodities2011年奖项
• Winner 2011 Stock Brokerage2
• Winner 2011 Futures Brokerage2
• Winner 2011 Forex Brokerage2
• 1st Runner Up 2011 Institutional Platform2
• 1st Runner Up 2011 Professional Platform2
• 1st Runner Up 2011 Options Analysis Software (Trader Workstation 4.0)2
7#
发表于 2011-8-13 14:50:17 | 只看该作者
提示: 作者被禁止或删除 内容自动屏蔽
8#
发表于 2011-8-13 18:31:54 | 只看该作者
原来没感觉到。这些天看过关于 Dukascopy  的争论,进一步了解了 Dukascopy。感觉 Dukascopy 有点过于优秀了。
IB 相关人员如此攻击 Dukascopy ,看来 Dukascopy  的确是 IB 的强有力竞争对手。
或许是 Dukascopy  对 IB 的业务造成了强大的冲击。
9#
发表于 2011-8-13 18:45:40 | 只看该作者
Dukascopy 怎么搞的,怎么会做得这么优秀。

攻击、谩骂 Dukascopy 的人,竟然找不到一点像样的 Dukascopy 的毛病。
10#
发表于 2011-8-13 19:52:02 | 只看该作者
论优点:IB在综合性上无人可比,DU的外汇专业性更胜一筹

缺点:IB的平台略显复杂,DU的点差稍大

PS:根本没有完美的平台,一个优秀的交易员应该把主要精力放在提升自己交易水平上,而不是纠结于平台(前提是合法的平台)之间的细微差异
您需要登录后才可以回帖 登录 | 注册

本版积分规则

QQ|Archiver|手机版|小黑屋|外汇堂·专业外汇论坛    

GMT+8, 2024-12-23 02:18 , Processed in 0.158288 second(s), 26 queries .

Powered by Discuz! X3.1

© 2001-2013 Comsenz Inc.

快速回复 返回顶部 返回列表